A reader asked me how to limit access to Office 365 services so that their organization can migrate to Exchange Online first, and then gradually adopt more services over a period of time. That’s a reasonable approach to Office 365 adoption, allowing users to adjust to each new feature and receive training, without overwhelming them with the entire suite of apps that are available. Organizations with strict security and compliance requirements need time to examine the different services and work out how to use them in a way that aligns with their organization’s policies. It also allows your IT teams to develop their knowledge and support processes as each feature is adopted by your organization.

To demonstrate how this can be managed let’s start by looking at the Office 365 home page for a user that has been licensed for Enterprise E3. There’s quite a lot of app tiles shown to this user because all licensed features included in E3 are showing up by default.

Apps shown on the Office 365 home page
Apps shown on the Office 365 home page

The visibility or availability of most Office 365 apps is controlled through licensing. To hide most apps from users you can remove those apps, often referred to as sub-SKU features, from the license assignment for the user. You can do this using groups-based licensing, PowerShell, or just do it using the Office 365 admin portal as shown in the screenshot below.

Disabling Office 365 license features
Disabling Office 365 license features

Now the user only sees the licensed features (Exchange Online, and they can also install Office 365 ProPlus), plus the Office Store.

The Office 365 app launcher with fewer apps
The Office 365 app launcher with fewer apps

So is it as simple as that? No, not really.

For starters, to get rid of the Store you need to turn it off for all users in Settings, Services & add-ins, and then Office Store.

Managing Adoption of Office 365 by Controlling Access to Apps

But that’s not all. Just because apps have been hidden from the home screen of the portal, and from the app launcher menu in the various web interfaces in Office 365, doesn’t mean that your users can’t still use them. Here’s some examples of apps that still work even after you’ve turned off the sub-SKU features in the license controls.

  • Forms (currently in preview) allows the user to access the forms app via the direct URL and create forms.
  • Stream allows any corporate user to sign up to Stream, upload content, and invite other users.
  • StaffHub allow the user to access the app via the direct URL and create teams/schedules, as long as they are permitted to create Groups, and as long as StaffHub is enabled at the tenant/organization level.
  • Planner allows the user to access the Planner app to create plans, as long as they are permitted to create Groups, and participate in plans that they are added to.
  • Office Online apps are accessible (e.g. creating and editing a Word doc in the web browser).
  • SharePoint libraries are accessible via Groups, and SharePoint Online is generally accessible as well.
  • Flow allows the user to sign in and create Flows that attach to their Exchange Online mailbox (I did not test access to other services via Flow).
  • PowerApps allows the user to sign in and start a trial (I did not test app creation).
  • To-Do (currently in preview) is not configurable on a per-user basis and must be turned on or off for the entire tenant. The web app doesn’t support company logins right now anyway, but the mobile apps do, so you might need to look at using MAM policies to control it if that is a concern for you.

Here’s a few apps that do seem to respect the disabled licenses:

  • Teams (user sees an “Ask your IT administrator for access to Microsoft Teams” message)
  • Sway (user sees a “Please contact your administrator to access Sway” message)

I did not test Skype for Business Online, Yammer, or the use of Azure Rights Management.

There are a few different approaches if you need to make sure your users aren’t using services that you’re not ready to support.

  • SharePoint Online access isn’t dependent on a license. You can use permissions to block access if you need to. Disabling the SharePoint Online license for a user does prevent them from using OneDrive for Business though.
  • If you want to limit access to SharePoint Online features that are used by Groups, then you should configure your Groups creation policies to prevent users from creating their own Groups. But ultimately if you are going to allow the use of Groups, then users will get access to a SharePoint file storage library for their Groups.
  • Planner and StaffHub ignore the license configuration as well, but being Groups-based apps you can use the Groups creation policies to limit their use.
  • For StaffHub you can turn it off at the tenant level if you don’t want to use it at all.

Microsoft Stream is a more complicated situation. Any account in your tenant is permitted to sign up for Stream even if the “Stream for Office 365” sub-SKU license is disabled for that user. When they sign up to Stream, a new and separate “Microsoft Stream” license is automatically added to your tenant, and enabled for that user who signed up to Stream. Other users can then sign in to Stream or be invited to participate, even if they do not have a Stream license enabled.

Microsoft Stream licenses appear after a user signs up
Microsoft Stream licenses appear after a user signs up

To disable signups to Microsoft Stream you need to block “ad-hoc subscriptions” for your tenant. You can do this by connecting to your tenant with the MSOnline PowerShell module and running the following command:

PS C:\> Set-MsolCompanySettings -AllowAdHocSubscriptions $false

Any subsequent user who tries to sign up or sign in to Microsoft Stream will be blocked, provided you have also disabled their license(s).

Microsoft Stream signup blocked
Microsoft Stream signup blocked

However, a user who has already started using Stream will be able to continue accessing it. Removing the licence(s) for Stream does remove the Stream tile from the Office 365 app launcher, but if they know the URL to access the Stream website directly they can just go there and use it. And since they’ve already signed up, the block on ad-hoc subscriptions is too late. So we need to use a different method to limit usage of the Stream service. If you’re doing an evaluation with a subset of your users, use the Stream admin controls to limit who can upload. If you want to block Stream entirely, use the Azure portal to block the Stream application.

Just be aware that the above command to disable ad-hoc subscriptions may prevent your users from using their work email address to sign up for other Microsoft services. Discouraging the use of corporate email for personal services is generally a good practice anyway.

Unfortunately, disabling ad-hoc subscriptions to prevent Stream usage doesn’t block the sign up or usage of Flow and PowerApps. At least not according to my testing. Both of those apps seem to disregard the sub-SKU license configuration for the user, as does the preview of Microsoft Forms. In fact, PowerApps has an FAQ entry stating that admins have no way to prevent corporate users signing up to PowerApps.

PowerApps is open for business!
PowerApps is open for business!

Circling back to the original question of how to limit access to apps a part of a controlled adoption process, you can see that it is not as simple as just turning off licenses, even though it should be, and even though that is what Microsoft advises to do in some cases (which then doesn’t work). Yes, by disabling licenses you’ll hide the apps from the app launcher on the web, but if users discover direct URLs for apps they can start using them anyway.

It’s also important to keep in mind that whatever Office 365 adoption controls you do put in place today might be undermined by a future new release, due to the “on by default” nature of new Office 365 features and services. This is all part of the complex and messy reality of managing change in Office 365.

About the Author

Paul Cunningham

Paul is a former Microsoft MVP for Office Apps and Services. He works as a consultant, writer, and trainer specializing in Office 365 and Exchange Server. Paul no longer writes for Practical365.com.


  1. LLC

    Yes, this is still a problem in late 2023. We have to block access to streaming for some of our users, as well as other apps available on ‘all apps’. The only think that seems to work is to remove SharePoint for that group of users, but this also blocks them from accession Word, Excel, and almost anything else. It’s really frustating not to have an easy way to point to a list of allowed/blocked apps and to apply it to a group of users from one of many administration panels. Impossible to comply with regulations too. I used to love the billion settings available on Microsoft, ready for blocking or allowing almost anything, but it seems that time is long past now.

  2. Ben

    Is this still an issue in 2023? This is the only article I could that was relevant.

    1. Avatar photo
      Tony Redmond

      What issue are you trying to solve? The option is still present (albeit in Settings – Org Settings – User Owned Apps and Services). Do you want to block users from specific apps?

  3. Joe Rodriguez

    Its disappointing that if I only want to use OneDrive I must also enable Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

  4. Kelly Jones

    We ran into an issue with the SharePoint license not being enforced so we opened a Premier Support ticket. We were able to request that the license was enforced for our tenant.

    We wanted to prevent unlicensed users from appearing in SharePoint’s people picker, which can only be done by enforcing the licensing.

    When we first migrated to SharePoint Online (circa early 2014), Microsoft was enforcing the SharePoint license. That changed sometime in late 2014 or 2015 and support told us that many companies were requesting it not be enforced. Turns out, if you migrate content from SharePoint on premises to SharePoint Online before you’ve licensed your users, then none of the content would have the correct authors/permissions. To prevent companies from bungling their migrations, Microsoft simply stopped enforcing the SharePoint license.

  5. Richard W

    Thanks for this article. Very helpful

  6. Bill

    Hi Paul – Where in the Office 365 Admin Portal can we access (your 2nd screenshot in this article) the sub-sku licensing page that allows us to see all the different services (Flow, Sway, Planner, Stream, etc.). When I look around in my environment, under users Active Users, I can select a user, but the only services shown are the fee-based services (i.e. Office 365 Enterprise 1, Azure Active Directory Premium P1, etc.) are shown and not the sub-skus like you show.


    1. Bill

      Add-on to my question above…

      Disabling sub-sku’s as you point out at the beginning of this article…is that the same (does it have the same effect) as using PowerShell to disable sub-sku licensing? PowerShell article is here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn771769.aspx


    2. Avatar photo
      Paul Cunningham

      Yes, those licenses can be expanded/collapsed to show the sub-SKU features just by clicking on them.

    3. Pete

      Same question here. How do you get to that page? I’ve navigated all over the site and this page/feature is nowhere to be found.

  7. Stewart Riley

    I recently raised a ticket with Microsoft about how to disable the ability for users to sign up for adhoc subscriptions. They gave the following response which they recommend not to disable this feature using the powershell command. I’d be interested in what you make of this response.

    “Currently there is no possibility for users to disable to subscribe to pro trials. Also as you said there are some adverse effects on other O365 applications when you use the below PowerShell command. You will not get other applications when Microsoft releases for you.

    So request you to not to use the below command.

    Set-MsolCompanySettings -AllowAdHocSubscriptions $false

    Please let me know if you need any other details. Or else please confirm if I am good to close the case.”

    1. Avatar photo
      Paul Cunningham

      Thanks for sharing your advice from MS support.

      I think the whole situation has turned into a complete mess and Microsoft really needs to lift their game. It’s not unreasonable for customers to want some level of control over this stuff. “On by default” is a reality we can live with. “Impossible to turn off” is a much bigger problem.

Leave a Reply